After each big data breach or hack, concerns are naturally raised about safety.
But one area that rarely receives a shout-out are the apps parents use to track kids. Yes, the apps help parents, but also give access to children’s phones.
Are there any foolproof ways to keep kids safe?
I’m surprised that conversations about school safety have barely touched on what promises to be a huge issue: school use of facial recognition technology.
Some question the accuracy of the technology, requesting testing across demographics, but the biggest concern has focused on privacy. Future discussions will undoubtedly include the potential of federal oversight, but it’s definitely a potential tool to consider in a school security arsenal.
Football fever is starting to fade in some high schools.
Although Friday night games will still be a tradition in many areas this fall, research shows a declining percentage of participating students. Concussion awareness has made coaches work harder at recruiting athletes and convincing parents the game is safe.
A ripple effect is inevitable for cheerleading squads, marching bands and booster clubs.
Participation in sports looks good on college applications, but fewer students will be listing football.
At all levels of education, the first weeks of the school year include active shooter drills.
However, parents and some mental health professionals are increasingly concerned that practicing how to respond in these potentially dangerous situations is adding emotional stress, starting in early childhood.
This fall, school systems are walking a fine line between empowering students to cope with situations, without creating unnecessary anxiety. Some say the next “new normal” for schools will be to help kids develop resilience. From what I’m seeing, we’re not there, yet.
The problem vexing administrators as they think ahead to the new school year: to ban or not to ban student cell phones.
Although cell phones have proven valuable in school shootings, the digital distraction is having a negative impact on learning.
Students at all levels are confident of their ability to multitask. However, research has shown that rapid attention shifts actually hijack our thinking.
Plus, the anxiety that results from being disconnected to phones, laptops and other gadgets also distracts from learning.
“To ban or not to ban?” The question is real. The answer is not clear.
Research says that parents are comfortable with kids having a connected toy or device, but only if it’s safe.
Security and data privacy continue to concern parents of digikids. Worries about online hackers or criminals locating a child through GPS tracking decreases if the “connected cocoon” around kids insures their safety.
A timely thought as schools close and screens open for the summer.
Although there’s a lot of chatter about VR (virtual reality) data show that children aren’t frequent users.
Concerns about exposure to inappropriate content via VR is a major issue for parents. In addition, health concerns, lack of knowledge and cost are contributing to the slower than expected consumer acceptance.